1 Serik, Rakym , Grade= 151, ID=0
LJC Kings July 2018 Rapidplay, Leicester, 02/06/2018, 02/06/2018
R C ID Cat OPPONENT Grd diff prtl res Cum Pts
1 B 4 Mottram-Epson, Alast 99 52 161 1.0 1.0 1.0
2 W 2 Kerbel, Sasha 112 39 62 0.0 1.0 4.0
3 B 5 Lv, Jason 89 62 161 1.0 2.0 2.0
4 W 3 Khare, Anika 104 47 111 0.5 2.5 2.5
Grading Performance=124 495 2.5

2 Kerbel, Sasha , Grade= 112, ID=0
LJC Kings July 2018 Rapidplay, Leicester, 02/06/2018, 02/06/2018
R C ID Cat OPPONENT Grd diff prtl res Cum Pts
1 W 5 Lv, Jason 89 23 139 1.0 1.0 2.0
2 B 1 Serik, Rakym 151 -39 201 1.0 2.0 2.5
3 W 3 Khare, Anika 104 8 154 1.0 3.0 2.5
4 B 6 Meynell, Austin 0 112 122 1.0 4.0 0.0
Grading Performance=154 616 4.0

3 Khare, Anika , Grade= 104, ID=0
LJC Kings July 2018 Rapidplay, Leicester, 02/06/2018, 02/06/2018
R C ID Cat OPPONENT Grd diff prtl res Cum Pts
1 B 6 Meynell, Austin 0 104 114 1.0 1.0 0.0
2 W 4 Mottram-Epson, Alast 99 5 149 1.0 2.0 1.0
3 B 2 Kerbel, Sasha 112 -8 62 0.0 2.0 4.0
4 B 1 Serik, Rakym 151 -47 144 0.5 2.5 2.5
Grading Performance=117 469 2.5

4 Mottram-Epson, Alast, Grade= 99, ID=0
LJC Kings July 2018 Rapidplay, Leicester, 02/06/2018, 02/06/2018
R C ID Cat OPPONENT Grd diff prtl res Cum Pts
1 W 1 Serik, Rakym 151 -52 89 0.0 0.0 2.5
2 B 3 Khare, Anika 104 -5 54 0.0 0.0 2.5
3 W 6 Meynell, Austin 0 99 109 1.0 1.0 0.0
4 W 5 Lv, Jason 89 10 39 0.0 1.0 2.0
Grading Performance= 73 291 1.0

5 Lv, Jason , Grade= 89, ID=0
LJC Kings July 2018 Rapidplay, Leicester, 02/06/2018, 02/06/2018
R C ID Cat OPPONENT Grd diff prtl res Cum Pts
1 B 2 Kerbel, Sasha 112 -23 62 0.0 0.0 4.0
2 W 6 Meynell, Austin 0 89 99 1.0 1.0 0.0
3 W 1 Serik, Rakym 151 -62 79 0.0 1.0 2.5
4 B 4 Mottram-Epson, Alast 99 -10 149 1.0 2.0 1.0
Grading Performance= 97 389 2.0

6 Meynell, Austin , Grade= 0, ID=0
LJC Kings July 2018 Rapidplay, Leicester, 02/06/2018, 02/06/2018
R C ID Cat OPPONENT Grd diff prtl res Cum Pts
1 W 3 Khare, Anika 104 -104 -10 0.0 0.0 2.5
2 B 5 Lv, Jason 89 -89 -10 0.0 0.0 2.0
3 B 4 Mottram-Epson, Alast 99 -99 -10 0.0 0.0 1.0
4 W 2 Kerbel, Sasha 112 -112 -10 0.0 0.0 4.0
Grading Performance= 0 -40 0.0