R | C | ID | Cat | OPPONENT | Grd | diff | prtl | res | Cum | Pts |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | B | 6 | Vadgama, Arjun | 80 | 44 | 134 | 1.0 | 1.0 | 1.5 | |
2 | W | 3 | Kerbel, Sasha | 98 | 26 | 98 | 0.5 | 1.5 | 2.0 | |
3 | B | 2 | Serik, Rakym | 113 | 11 | 63 | 0.0 | 1.5 | 3.5 | |
4 | W | 7 | Muthusamy, Rakshai | 58 | 66 | 84 | 0.5 | 2.0 | 1.0 | |
Grading Performance= 95 | 379 | 2.0 |
R | C | ID | Cat | OPPONENT | Grd | diff | prtl | res | Cum | Pts |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | W | 5 | Mottram-Epson, Pete | 97 | 16 | 147 | 1.0 | 1.0 | 2.0 | |
2 | B | 4 | Mottram-Epson, Alas | 98 | 15 | 148 | 1.0 | 2.0 | 3.0 | |
3 | W | 1 | Chen, Daniel | 124 | -11 | 174 | 1.0 | 3.0 | 2.0 | |
4 | B | 3 | Kerbel, Sasha | 98 | 15 | 98 | 0.5 | 3.5 | 2.0 | |
Grading Performance=142 | 567 | 3.5 |
R | C | ID | Cat | OPPONENT | Grd | diff | prtl | res | Cum | Pts |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | W | 7 | Muthusamy, Rakshai | 58 | 40 | 108 | 1.0 | 1.0 | 1.0 | |
2 | B | 1 | Chen, Daniel | 124 | -26 | 124 | 0.5 | 1.5 | 2.0 | |
3 | W | 4 | Mottram-Epson, Alas | 98 | 0 | 48 | 0.0 | 1.5 | 3.0 | |
4 | W | 2 | Serik, Rakym | 113 | -15 | 113 | 0.5 | 2.0 | 3.5 | |
Grading Performance= 98 | 393 | 2.0 |
R | C | ID | Cat | OPPONENT | Grd | diff | prtl | res | Cum | Pts |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | B | 8 | Coutts, Matthew | 35 | 63 | 108 | 1.0 | 1.0 | 1.0 | |
2 | W | 2 | Serik, Rakym | 113 | -15 | 63 | 0.0 | 1.0 | 3.5 | |
3 | B | 3 | Kerbel, Sasha | 98 | 0 | 148 | 1.0 | 2.0 | 2.0 | |
4 | W | 5 | Mottram-Epson, Pete | 97 | 1 | 147 | 1.0 | 3.0 | 2.0 | |
Grading Performance=117 | 466 | 3.0 |
R | C | ID | Cat | OPPONENT | Grd | diff | prtl | res | Cum | Pts |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | B | 2 | Serik, Rakym | 113 | -16 | 63 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 3.5 | |
2 | W | 8 | Coutts, Matthew | 35 | 62 | 107 | 1.0 | 1.0 | 1.0 | |
3 | B | 6 | Vadgama, Arjun | 80 | 17 | 130 | 1.0 | 2.0 | 1.5 | |
4 | B | 4 | Mottram-Epson, Alas | 98 | -1 | 48 | 0.0 | 2.0 | 3.0 | |
Grading Performance= 87 | 348 | 2.0 |
R | C | ID | Cat | OPPONENT | Grd | diff | prtl | res | Cum | Pts |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | W | 1 | Chen, Daniel | 124 | -44 | 70 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 2.0 | |
2 | B | 7 | Muthusamy, Rakshai | 58 | 22 | 58 | 0.5 | 0.5 | 1.0 | |
3 | W | 5 | Mottram-Epson, Pete | 97 | -17 | 47 | 0.0 | 0.5 | 2.0 | |
4 | W | 8 | Coutts, Matthew | 35 | 45 | 90 | 1.0 | 1.5 | 1.0 | |
Grading Performance= 66 | 265 | 1.5 |
R | C | ID | Cat | OPPONENT | Grd | diff | prtl | res | Cum | Pts |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | B | 3 | Kerbel, Sasha | 98 | -40 | 48 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 2.0 | |
2 | W | 6 | Vadgama, Arjun | 80 | -22 | 80 | 0.5 | 0.5 | 1.5 | |
3 | B | 8 | Coutts, Matthew | 35 | 23 | -15 | 0.0 | 0.5 | 1.0 | |
4 | B | 1 | Chen, Daniel | 124 | -66 | 98 | 0.5 | 1.0 | 2.0 | |
Grading Performance= 53 | 211 | 1.0 |
R | C | ID | Cat | OPPONENT | Grd | diff | prtl | res | Cum | Pts |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | W | 4 | Mottram-Epson, Alas | 98 | -63 | 25 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 3.0 | |
2 | B | 5 | Mottram-Epson, Pete | 97 | -62 | 25 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 2.0 | |
3 | W | 7 | Muthusamy, Rakshai | 58 | -23 | 108 | 1.0 | 1.0 | 1.0 | |
4 | B | 6 | Vadgama, Arjun | 80 | -45 | 25 | 0.0 | 1.0 | 1.5 | |
Grading Performance= 46 | 183 | 1.0 |