LJC Kings September 2016 Rapidplay | ||||
Participants | Tables | Rounds | Report | |
Sorted by Rating Sorted by Name Statistics | Cross table by ID Cross table by score Standing |
R | C | ID | Cat | OPPONENT | Grd | diff | prtl | res | Cum | Pts |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | W | 5 | Matts, Stephen | 89 | 15 | 89 | 0.5 | 0.5 | 2.0 | |
2 | B | 7 | Phillips, David | 84 | 20 | 34 | 0.0 | 0.5 | 4.0 | |
3 | W | 2 | Mottram-Epson, Pete | 93 | 11 | 143 | 1.0 | 1.5 | 2.0 | |
4 | B | 8 | Kerbel, Sacha | 55 | 49 | 114 | 1.0 | 2.5 | 0.0 | |
Grading Performance= 95 | 380 | 2.5 |
R | C | ID | Cat | OPPONENT | Grd | diff | prtl | res | Cum | Pts |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | B | 6 | Harbridge, Drew | 88 | 5 | 38 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 2.5 | |
2 | W | 8 | Kerbel, Sacha | 55 | 38 | 105 | 1.0 | 1.0 | 0.0 | |
3 | B | 1 | Raine, Ben | 104 | -11 | 54 | 0.0 | 1.0 | 2.5 | |
4 | W | 3 | Mottram-Epson, Alas | 91 | 2 | 141 | 1.0 | 2.0 | 1.0 | |
Grading Performance= 85 | 338 | 2.0 |
R | C | ID | Cat | OPPONENT | Grd | diff | prtl | res | Cum | Pts |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | W | 7 | Phillips, David | 84 | 7 | 34 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 4.0 | |
2 | B | 5 | Matts, Stephen | 89 | 2 | 39 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 2.0 | |
3 | W | 8 | Kerbel, Sacha | 55 | 36 | 105 | 1.0 | 1.0 | 0.0 | |
4 | B | 2 | Mottram-Epson, Pete | 93 | -2 | 43 | 0.0 | 1.0 | 2.0 | |
Grading Performance= 55 | 221 | 1.0 |
R | C | ID | Cat | OPPONENT | Grd | diff | prtl | res | Cum | Pts |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | B | 8 | Kerbel, Sacha | 55 | 36 | 105 | 1.0 | 1.0 | 0.0 | |
2 | W | 6 | Harbridge, Drew | 88 | 3 | 88 | 0.5 | 1.5 | 2.5 | |
3 | W | 7 | Phillips, David | 84 | 7 | 34 | 0.0 | 1.5 | 4.0 | |
4 | B | 5 | Matts, Stephen | 89 | 2 | 89 | 0.5 | 2.0 | 2.0 | |
Grading Performance= 79 | 316 | 2.0 |
R | C | ID | Cat | OPPONENT | Grd | diff | prtl | res | Cum | Pts |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | B | 1 | Raine, Ben | 104 | -15 | 104 | 0.5 | 0.5 | 2.5 | |
2 | W | 3 | Mottram-Epson, Alas | 91 | -2 | 141 | 1.0 | 1.5 | 1.0 | |
3 | B | 6 | Harbridge, Drew | 88 | 1 | 38 | 0.0 | 1.5 | 2.5 | |
4 | W | 4 | Ward-Langman | 91 | -2 | 91 | 0.5 | 2.0 | 2.0 | |
Grading Performance= 94 | 374 | 2.0 |
R | C | ID | Cat | OPPONENT | Grd | diff | prtl | res | Cum | Pts |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | W | 2 | Mottram-Epson, Pete | 93 | -5 | 143 | 1.0 | 1.0 | 2.0 | |
2 | B | 4 | Ward-Langman | 91 | -3 | 91 | 0.5 | 1.5 | 2.0 | |
3 | W | 5 | Matts, Stephen | 89 | -1 | 139 | 1.0 | 2.5 | 2.0 | |
4 | B | 7 | Phillips, David | 84 | 4 | 34 | 0.0 | 2.5 | 4.0 | |
Grading Performance=102 | 407 | 2.5 |
R | C | ID | Cat | OPPONENT | Grd | diff | prtl | res | Cum | Pts |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | B | 3 | Mottram-Epson, Alas | 91 | -7 | 141 | 1.0 | 1.0 | 1.0 | |
2 | W | 1 | Raine, Ben | 104 | -20 | 154 | 1.0 | 2.0 | 2.5 | |
3 | B | 4 | Ward-Langman | 91 | -7 | 141 | 1.0 | 3.0 | 2.0 | |
4 | W | 6 | Harbridge, Drew | 88 | -4 | 138 | 1.0 | 4.0 | 2.5 | |
Grading Performance=144 | 574 | 4.0 |
R | C | ID | Cat | OPPONENT | Grd | diff | prtl | res | Cum | Pts |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | W | 4 | Ward-Langman | 91 | -36 | 41 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 2.0 | |
2 | B | 2 | Mottram-Epson, Pete | 93 | -38 | 43 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 2.0 | |
3 | B | 3 | Mottram-Epson, Alas | 91 | -36 | 41 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 1.0 | |
4 | W | 1 | Raine, Ben | 104 | -49 | 45 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 2.5 | |
Grading Performance= 43 | 170 | 0.0 |