U9 .::. U11 .::. U18 |
Leicester Junior Champs U9 | ||||
Participants | Tables | Rounds | Report | |
Sorted by Rating Sorted by Name Statistics | Cross table by ID Cross table by score Standing |
R | C | ID | Cat | OPPONENT | Grd | diff | prtl | res | Cum | Pts |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | B | 12 | Shah, Dhian | 45 | 47 | 102 | 1.0 | 1.0 | 3.0 | |
2 | W | 8 | Ito, Tansei | 58 | 34 | 108 | 1.0 | 2.0 | 4.0 | |
3 | B | 10 | Vadgama, Arjun | 53 | 39 | 103 | 1.0 | 3.0 | 4.0 | |
4 | W | 9 | Weinberg, Ellis | 54 | 38 | 104 | 1.0 | 4.0 | 3.0 | |
5 | B | 4 | Hirst, Joe | 75 | 17 | 125 | 1.0 | 5.0 | 3.0 | |
6 | W | 7 | Sanyal, Sarthak | 60 | 32 | 110 | 1.0 | 6.0 | 4.0 | |
Grading Performance=109 | 652 | 6.0 |
R | C | ID | Cat | OPPONENT | Grd | diff | prtl | res | Cum | Pts |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | W | 13 | Miles, Evan | 38 | 42 | 90 | 1.0 | 1.0 | 2.0 | |
2 | B | 7 | Sanyal, Sarthak | 60 | 20 | 10 | 0.0 | 1.0 | 4.0 | |
3 | W | 9 | Weinberg, Ellis | 54 | 26 | 4 | 0.0 | 1.0 | 3.0 | |
4 | B | 17 | Wheway, Hope | 35 | 45 | 90 | 1.0 | 2.0 | 3.0 | |
5 | W | 15 | Syed, Hafsa | 35 | 45 | 90 | 1.0 | 3.0 | 2.0 | |
6 | B | 8 | Ito, Tansei | 58 | 22 | 108 | 1.0 | 4.0 | 4.0 | |
Grading Performance= 65 | 392 | 4.0 |
R | C | ID | Cat | OPPONENT | Grd | diff | prtl | res | Cum | Pts |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | B | 14 | Greenhalgh, Thomas | 35 | 43 | 88 | 1.0 | 1.0 | 2.0 | |
2 | W | 10 | Vadgama, Arjun | 53 | 25 | 3 | 0.0 | 1.0 | 4.0 | |
3 | B | 16 | Szasz, Lilli | 35 | 43 | 38 | 0.5 | 1.5 | 3.5 | |
4 | W | 18 | Easwar, Prakash | 30 | 48 | 88 | 1.0 | 2.5 | 1.5 | |
5 | W | 8 | Ito, Tansei | 58 | 20 | 8 | 0.0 | 2.5 | 4.0 | |
6 | B | 13 | Miles, Evan | 38 | 40 | 88 | 1.0 | 3.5 | 2.0 | |
Grading Performance= 52 | 313 | 3.5 |
R | C | ID | Cat | OPPONENT | Grd | diff | prtl | res | Cum | Pts |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | W | 15 | Syed, Hafsa | 35 | 40 | 85 | 1.0 | 1.0 | 2.0 | |
2 | B | 9 | Weinberg, Ellis | 54 | 21 | 4 | 0.0 | 1.0 | 3.0 | |
3 | W | 17 | Wheway, Hope | 35 | 40 | 85 | 1.0 | 2.0 | 3.0 | |
4 | B | 7 | Sanyal, Sarthak | 60 | 15 | 110 | 1.0 | 3.0 | 4.0 | |
5 | W | 1 | Chen, Daniel Xingyu | 92 | -17 | 42 | 0.0 | 3.0 | 6.0 | |
6 | B | 10 | Vadgama, Arjun | 53 | 22 | 3 | 0.0 | 3.0 | 4.0 | |
Grading Performance= 55 | 329 | 3.0 |
R | C | ID | Cat | OPPONENT | Grd | diff | prtl | res | Cum | Pts |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | -- | 0 | not played | 0 | -- | -- | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | |
2 | -- | 0 | not played | 0 | -- | -- | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | |
3 | -- | 0 | not played | 0 | -- | -- | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | |
4 | -- | 0 | not played | 0 | -- | -- | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | |
5 | -- | 0 | not played | 0 | -- | -- | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | |
6 | -- | 0 | not played | 0 | -- | -- | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | |
Grading Performance= 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
R | C | ID | Cat | OPPONENT | Grd | diff | prtl | res | Cum | Pts |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | -- | 0 | not played | 0 | -- | -- | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | |
2 | -- | 0 | not played | 0 | -- | -- | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | |
3 | -- | 0 | not played | 0 | -- | -- | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | |
4 | -- | 0 | not played | 0 | -- | -- | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | |
5 | -- | 0 | not played | 0 | -- | -- | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | |
6 | -- | 0 | not played | 0 | -- | -- | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | |
Grading Performance= 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
R | C | ID | Cat | OPPONENT | Grd | diff | prtl | res | Cum | Pts |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | B | 16 | Szasz, Lilli | 35 | 25 | 85 | 1.0 | 1.0 | 3.5 | |
2 | W | 2 | Dharmasena, Kian | 80 | -20 | 130 | 1.0 | 2.0 | 4.0 | |
3 | B | 11 | LV, Jason | 50 | 10 | 100 | 1.0 | 3.0 | 4.0 | |
4 | W | 4 | Hirst, Joe | 75 | -15 | 25 | 0.0 | 3.0 | 3.0 | |
5 | B | 9 | Weinberg, Ellis | 54 | 6 | 104 | 1.0 | 4.0 | 3.0 | |
6 | B | 1 | Chen, Daniel Xingyu | 92 | -32 | 42 | 0.0 | 4.0 | 6.0 | |
Grading Performance= 81 | 486 | 4.0 |
R | C | ID | Cat | OPPONENT | Grd | diff | prtl | res | Cum | Pts |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | W | 17 | Wheway, Hope | 35 | 23 | 85 | 1.0 | 1.0 | 3.0 | |
2 | B | 1 | Chen, Daniel Xingyu | 92 | -34 | 42 | 0.0 | 1.0 | 6.0 | |
3 | W | 20 | Salvio, Salesia | 30 | 28 | 80 | 1.0 | 2.0 | 1.5 | |
4 | W | 11 | LV, Jason | 50 | 8 | 100 | 1.0 | 3.0 | 4.0 | |
5 | B | 3 | Syed, Umar | 78 | -20 | 128 | 1.0 | 4.0 | 3.5 | |
6 | W | 2 | Dharmasena, Kian | 80 | -22 | 30 | 0.0 | 4.0 | 4.0 | |
Grading Performance= 78 | 465 | 4.0 |
R | C | ID | Cat | OPPONENT | Grd | diff | prtl | res | Cum | Pts |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | B | 18 | Easwar, Prakash | 30 | 24 | 80 | 1.0 | 1.0 | 1.5 | |
2 | W | 4 | Hirst, Joe | 75 | -21 | 125 | 1.0 | 2.0 | 3.0 | |
3 | B | 2 | Dharmasena, Kian | 80 | -26 | 130 | 1.0 | 3.0 | 4.0 | |
4 | B | 1 | Chen, Daniel Xingyu | 92 | -38 | 42 | 0.0 | 3.0 | 6.0 | |
5 | W | 7 | Sanyal, Sarthak | 60 | -6 | 10 | 0.0 | 3.0 | 4.0 | |
6 | W | 11 | LV, Jason | 50 | 4 | 0 | 0.0 | 3.0 | 4.0 | |
Grading Performance= 65 | 387 | 3.0 |
R | C | ID | Cat | OPPONENT | Grd | diff | prtl | res | Cum | Pts |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | W | 19 | Gosai, Anay | 30 | 23 | 80 | 1.0 | 1.0 | 0.0 | |
2 | B | 3 | Syed, Umar | 78 | -25 | 128 | 1.0 | 2.0 | 3.5 | |
3 | W | 1 | Chen, Daniel Xingyu | 92 | -39 | 42 | 0.0 | 2.0 | 6.0 | |
4 | B | 16 | Szasz, Lilli | 35 | 18 | -15 | 0.0 | 2.0 | 3.5 | |
5 | W | 13 | Miles, Evan | 38 | 15 | 88 | 1.0 | 3.0 | 2.0 | |
6 | W | 4 | Hirst, Joe | 75 | -22 | 125 | 1.0 | 4.0 | 3.0 | |
Grading Performance= 75 | 448 | 4.0 |
R | C | ID | Cat | OPPONENT | Grd | diff | prtl | res | Cum | Pts |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | B | 20 | Salvio, Salesia | 30 | 20 | 80 | 1.0 | 1.0 | 1.5 | |
2 | W | 12 | Shah, Dhian | 45 | 5 | 95 | 1.0 | 2.0 | 3.0 | |
3 | W | 7 | Sanyal, Sarthak | 60 | -10 | 10 | 0.0 | 2.0 | 4.0 | |
4 | B | 8 | Ito, Tansei | 58 | -8 | 8 | 0.0 | 2.0 | 4.0 | |
5 | W | 16 | Szasz, Lilli | 35 | 15 | 85 | 1.0 | 3.0 | 3.5 | |
6 | B | 9 | Weinberg, Ellis | 54 | -4 | 104 | 1.0 | 4.0 | 3.0 | |
Grading Performance= 64 | 382 | 4.0 |
R | C | ID | Cat | OPPONENT | Grd | diff | prtl | res | Cum | Pts |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | W | 1 | Chen, Daniel Xingyu | 92 | -47 | 35 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 6.0 | |
2 | B | 11 | LV, Jason | 50 | -5 | 0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 4.0 | |
3 | W | 13 | Miles, Evan | 38 | 7 | -12 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 2.0 | |
4 | -- | 0 | not played | 0 | -- | -- | 1.0 | 1.0 | 0.0 | |
5 | B | 18 | Easwar, Prakash | 30 | 15 | 80 | 1.0 | 2.0 | 1.5 | |
6 | B | 15 | Syed, Hafsa | 35 | 10 | 85 | 1.0 | 3.0 | 2.0 | |
Grading Performance= 38 | 188 | 3.0 |
R | C | ID | Cat | OPPONENT | Grd | diff | prtl | res | Cum | Pts |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | B | 2 | Dharmasena, Kian | 80 | -42 | 28 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 4.0 | |
2 | W | 16 | Szasz, Lilli | 35 | 3 | -15 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 3.5 | |
3 | B | 12 | Shah, Dhian | 45 | -7 | 95 | 1.0 | 1.0 | 3.0 | |
4 | W | 14 | Greenhalgh, Thomas | 35 | 3 | 85 | 1.0 | 2.0 | 2.0 | |
5 | B | 10 | Vadgama, Arjun | 53 | -15 | 3 | 0.0 | 2.0 | 4.0 | |
6 | W | 3 | Syed, Umar | 78 | -40 | 28 | 0.0 | 2.0 | 3.5 | |
Grading Performance= 37 | 224 | 2.0 |
R | C | ID | Cat | OPPONENT | Grd | diff | prtl | res | Cum | Pts |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | W | 3 | Syed, Umar | 78 | -43 | 25 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 3.5 | |
2 | B | 17 | Wheway, Hope | 35 | 0 | -15 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 3.0 | |
3 | W | 15 | Syed, Hafsa | 35 | 0 | 85 | 1.0 | 1.0 | 2.0 | |
4 | B | 13 | Miles, Evan | 38 | -3 | -12 | 0.0 | 1.0 | 2.0 | |
5 | -- | 0 | not played | 0 | -- | -- | 1.0 | 2.0 | 0.0 | |
6 | W | 16 | Szasz, Lilli | 35 | 0 | -15 | 0.0 | 2.0 | 3.5 | |
Grading Performance= 14 | 68 | 2.0 |
R | C | ID | Cat | OPPONENT | Grd | diff | prtl | res | Cum | Pts |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | B | 4 | Hirst, Joe | 75 | -40 | 25 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 3.0 | |
2 | W | 18 | Easwar, Prakash | 30 | 5 | 80 | 1.0 | 1.0 | 1.5 | |
3 | B | 14 | Greenhalgh, Thomas | 35 | 0 | -15 | 0.0 | 1.0 | 2.0 | |
4 | W | 20 | Salvio, Salesia | 30 | 5 | 80 | 1.0 | 2.0 | 1.5 | |
5 | B | 2 | Dharmasena, Kian | 80 | -45 | 25 | 0.0 | 2.0 | 4.0 | |
6 | W | 12 | Shah, Dhian | 45 | -10 | -5 | 0.0 | 2.0 | 3.0 | |
Grading Performance= 32 | 190 | 2.0 |
R | C | ID | Cat | OPPONENT | Grd | diff | prtl | res | Cum | Pts |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | W | 7 | Sanyal, Sarthak | 60 | -25 | 10 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 4.0 | |
2 | B | 13 | Miles, Evan | 38 | -3 | 88 | 1.0 | 1.0 | 2.0 | |
3 | W | 3 | Syed, Umar | 78 | -43 | 75 | 0.5 | 1.5 | 3.5 | |
4 | W | 10 | Vadgama, Arjun | 53 | -18 | 103 | 1.0 | 2.5 | 4.0 | |
5 | B | 11 | LV, Jason | 50 | -15 | 0 | 0.0 | 2.5 | 4.0 | |
6 | B | 14 | Greenhalgh, Thomas | 35 | 0 | 85 | 1.0 | 3.5 | 2.0 | |
Grading Performance= 60 | 361 | 3.5 |
R | C | ID | Cat | OPPONENT | Grd | diff | prtl | res | Cum | Pts |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | B | 8 | Ito, Tansei | 58 | -23 | 8 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 4.0 | |
2 | W | 14 | Greenhalgh, Thomas | 35 | 0 | 85 | 1.0 | 1.0 | 2.0 | |
3 | B | 4 | Hirst, Joe | 75 | -40 | 25 | 0.0 | 1.0 | 3.0 | |
4 | W | 2 | Dharmasena, Kian | 80 | -45 | 25 | 0.0 | 1.0 | 4.0 | |
5 | B | 20 | Salvio, Salesia | 30 | 5 | 80 | 1.0 | 2.0 | 1.5 | |
6 | -- | 0 | not played | 0 | -- | -- | 1.0 | 3.0 | 0.0 | |
Grading Performance= 45 | 223 | 3.0 |
R | C | ID | Cat | OPPONENT | Grd | diff | prtl | res | Cum | Pts |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | W | 9 | Weinberg, Ellis | 54 | -24 | 4 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 3.0 | |
2 | B | 15 | Syed, Hafsa | 35 | -5 | -15 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 2.0 | |
3 | -- | 0 | not played | 0 | -- | -- | 1.0 | 1.0 | 0.0 | |
4 | B | 3 | Syed, Umar | 78 | -48 | 20 | 0.0 | 1.0 | 3.5 | |
5 | W | 12 | Shah, Dhian | 45 | -15 | -5 | 0.0 | 1.0 | 3.0 | |
6 | B | 20 | Salvio, Salesia | 30 | 0 | 30 | 0.5 | 1.5 | 1.5 | |
Grading Performance= 7 | 34 | 1.5 |
R | C | ID | Cat | OPPONENT | Grd | diff | prtl | res | Cum | Pts |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | B | 10 | Vadgama, Arjun | 53 | -23 | 3 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 4.0 | |
2 | -- | 0 | not played | 0 | -- | -- | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | |
3 | -- | 0 | not played | 0 | -- | -- | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | |
4 | -- | 0 | not played | 0 | -- | -- | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | |
5 | -- | 0 | not played | 0 | -- | -- | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | |
6 | -- | 0 | not played | 0 | -- | -- | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | |
Grading Performance= 3 | 3 | 0.0 |
R | C | ID | Cat | OPPONENT | Grd | diff | prtl | res | Cum | Pts |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | W | 11 | LV, Jason | 50 | -20 | 0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 4.0 | |
2 | -- | 0 | not played | 0 | -- | -- | 1.0 | 1.0 | 0.0 | |
3 | B | 8 | Ito, Tansei | 58 | -28 | 8 | 0.0 | 1.0 | 4.0 | |
4 | B | 15 | Syed, Hafsa | 35 | -5 | -15 | 0.0 | 1.0 | 2.0 | |
5 | W | 17 | Wheway, Hope | 35 | -5 | -15 | 0.0 | 1.0 | 3.0 | |
6 | W | 18 | Easwar, Prakash | 30 | 0 | 30 | 0.5 | 1.5 | 1.5 | |
Grading Performance= 2 | 8 | 1.5 |